Ep. 42 | 🍿Comment Chaos: Misplaced Projections, Australia’s Feminist Grip, and the Spirituality Cult
EPISODE TRANSCRIPT
How the bloody hell are you? Legends. Welcome back to a comment chaos episode of controversial as fuck. Today, we're going to be all over the place. We're just going to be reading out comments from all different podcast episodes. I don't want this to just be one particular topic. We're going to be, addressing all of your comments on all different topics.
So I'm excited for this. First of all let's start with. Okay. So I did a episode that was about YouTube bans the Jewish power narrative and free speech wars. So it was me reading through all different comments from YouTube and compiling them into one comment case episode. So someone here by Matt Shirley has said you're a half wit.
What a way to start this episode. Um, Matt, I got to explain something to you. My friend.
That actually cannot affect me. And I'll tell you why. I really mean this. I grew up with three siblings. I have two brothers and one sister, so there was four of us growing up. If you think that that's the first time I've ever been called a [00:01:00] halfwit. Dear God. And dream on like picture four siblings, right. Growing up. All together. All the time we have called each other, every name under the sun halfwit
is lame. It is the lowest end of the spectrum. We would have called each other. Retards probably. Oh, I was about to say see you next Tuesdays. But actually we wouldn't have, because we were good Christian kids. we probably didn't go that far. But picture everything you can possibly say without maybe swearing at each other.
And even then we probably did. So. Yeah, calling me a halfwit it's like, and. Surely you can do better than that, Matt. But anyway, I would have loved if Matt actually explained to me why I'm a half wit, which part of the video made me a half wit? Is it the whole thing Matt? Is it just my views on YouTube bands that triggered you?
Is it the Jewish power narrative that. You know, pissed you off or is it my take on free speech wars? Which part [00:02:00] was it, Matt that triggered the fuck out of you that made you want to go online and comment 'you're a half wit' to a complete stranger. I'd love to know. Comment me back and let me know. My response to Matt was let me have a look.
Cheers. Red love heart.
I was like, cheers. Sending you all the love in the world. All right. So then we've got.
On a separate video. I was talking about is masculinity under attack, and this was just a very short clip. Like one of those reels that was a YouTube short that went onto YouTube. And so someone has said, God bless Bettina Arndt, a R N D T, who I recently found out about if you've heard on one of the other episodes, I'm actually going to try and get her on the podcast.
I'm excited for this. Anyway, this person said, God bless Bettina. And may God bless you. Ma'am and then I have responded with, thank you kindly. And then someone else has said, what do you think about my take? And then underneath that, they've added another comment so that you can see. This was their comment. My friend who's straight was recently dragged to a [00:03:00] Gay bar by one of her friends. She said the women there were a hundred percent more aggressive in their approach than men usually are with her in regular bars. But even with that level of intensity, she didn't feel threatened. And she realized it was because there wasn't a big disparity in strength between her and the women approaching her.
So picture this. A straight woman goes to a gay bar with one of her friends. These I'm guessing lesbian or BI women in this gay bar were aggressively approaching her. Like obviously quite confident, really approaching her. You know, trying to hit on her essentially. And she's saying that they were more aggressive than what she's used to males approaching her in non gay bars.
But even with that level of aggression, she didn't feel threatened because she felt that there wasn't this huge disparity in strength between her and the women. By the way it goes on. And I think this person has a great point. This really got me thinking a lot of why masculinity is often perceived as threatening. I could come down to this underlying difference in physical [00:04:00] strength. I agree.
I do think this is a big part of it. When we interact with someone who has a clear physical advantage, our instincts naturally kick in to make us more cautious. Even if we don't consciously think about it, it's almost like if a lion were to approach us no matter how calm or well-intentioned that lion might be, we'd still feel on edge simply because of its power. This might even explain why certain behaviours that could be harmless, get labeled as toxic masculinity. For instance, people sometimes interpret it as a toxic When men interrupt women in conversations, but perhaps rather than being intentionally dismissive, some men might just be excited or passionate about the topic. He has a good point. However, because of the physical disparity that interruption might feel more intrusive or imposing to women on a subconscious level. Evolutionarily, we're wired to see strength as potential dominance.
And we might interpret an [00:05:00] interruption as intentionally forceful. Even if it wasn't meant that way, there are probably other traits labeled as toxic masculinity that could stem From this same instinctual response to physical disparity, things like men speaking, assertively taking up space, or even showing intense enthusiasm might be seen as threatening. Simply because strength is perceived as a factor. Even if unconsciously. In many cases, these behaviours could just be natural expressions of personality, rather than any intent to overpower or intimidate. But due to our instinctive responses, we might sometimes misinterpret these actions as signs of malice or dominance. When really they're just normal human behaviours magnified by the lens of physical strength disparity.
I've got. Mention this person's name. I thought this was such an incredible thought provoking. Very articulate. Well put comment. So this is Connor hunter. 9 3 9 4 on YouTube Connor. [00:06:00] Fantastic. Like, I really wanted to add this into this comment chaos episode, because you put so much thought into your comment and it's so well put, I agree. I do agree.
I've made it very clear that I don't believe masculinity is toxic and can be expressed in a toxic way because the moment that masculinity is expressed. And deemed as toxic. It is no longer masculinity, right? That's my point. Masculinity is not toxic and is not inherently toxic. It's impossible for masculinity, in my opinion, in my humble opinion, to be toxic.
If someone is expressing like, if a male is expressing themselves in a toxic way, It's not their masculinity. That is to blame. It's a lot of other factors potentially, you know, unhealed trauma, as it could be a lack of self-responsibility a lack of maturity.
It could be so many different things. Right. But I don't believe that it is the masculinity that is to blame in the same way that if myself, as a feminine woman, Starts to express myself in [00:07:00] very toxic ways and toxic behaviours
It's not my femininity. That is to blame. My femininity is not being expressed in a toxic way. Other parts of me are. Right. So I've made it clear. I don't believe masculinity is inherently toxic and can be expressed in a toxic way because then it's no longer masculinity. And I think Connor has made such good points.
I think that often, and this is my interpretation of what he has said. I've just read what he said. Often, I think that. These traits that are expressed, that people are claiming a toxic masculinity aren't and instead it is probably behind it, the perceived threat because of the strength behind the individual.
So for instance, if a man and a woman both said the exact same thing in the exact same way, the male would likely be deemed as more threatening or as more of a threat, simply because of, of the amount of physical prowess he has, or the amount of strength that he harnesses. That you know, being [00:08:00] behind the actions, the behaviours, the expression. Compounds it potentially to make it seem more threatening.
Whereas the threat actually isn't there. Yeah, I do think that this is probably why certain behaviours are labeled as toxic masculinity when they're actually not. There's no intent behind them. It's just such a well-put comment. I really appreciated you Connor and I have not had the chance yet to actually go in and physically type a response.
So this is my response to you. Thank you. I fully agree with what you're saying, and I think you've raised some really, really great points there.
Now the whole separate. Video back to the YouTube bans, Jewish power narrative, and free speech wars. I just want to point out that if you have a platform and you speak on controversial topics, or even if you just speak. Strongly on any topic out there, be prepared for a lot of being misunderstood, but also projections as in you can have 10 different people.
Listen to what you say or read what you [00:09:00] know read the words that you've spoken, right. And all 10 of those people will have a complete different view of you, but also a complete different interpretation of what you've said, because. Us as human beings fill in the blanks of what we perceive someone is saying that may not even be there based off. Ourselves and our own. View of the world, right?
The way that we project onto the world, it's not about the world. It's about us. So. As I said, I could say something and 10 different people can take it 10 different ways. And this is very evident when I read out comments, I find this so fascinating. So. When I was talking about the Jewish power narrative, the whole thing is that I don't believe that just because you critique individuals or families based off things that have nothing to do with being Jewish and you don't even mention being Jewish, right.
If you could take. You know, certain things did you do with these families have [00:10:00] control of how, like, for instance, I've used examples before mentioning Rockefeller's Rothschild's right. Just because you critique them and maybe the power that they willed, or if you think there might be corruption there and maybe you're scrutinizing. You know, their business ethics or something to do with. I don't know, it could be anything, right.
Just because you could take those individuals does not make you an anti-Semite just because they happen to be do, but you're not even discussing them being Jew. Right. That was what started this whole thing. So I was explaining that I will not be told that I cannot critique an individual. Or a family or a system or a group of people.
Right. Just because they happen to be do when I'm not critiquing the fact that they're due. That's insanity to me. Someone has commented and said if a bunch of people get Burt, get persecuted, just because they had a Jewish mom, there is a pretty good reason for it. dot.dot, dot dot. Yeah,
You're not antisemitic, of course, but it's [00:11:00] fine. Being racist is cool now. Dude, I've got to say, get a fucking grip. I never said That if a bunch of people get persecuted, just because they have a Jewish mom that that's, that there's a good reason for it.
I have never said that this is the apitomy of projections and it's something, honestly, you have to get comfortable with. If you have a platform, I am completely comfortable with that. Now I was not in the beginning. I am now because it's like, Like damned if you do damned, if you don't, you just got to get comfortable with it. But dude. You are projecting what you think I'm saying that I'm actually not saying, I don't think anybody on this planet should be persecuted because they have a Jewish mom. That is despicable behavior.
That is disgusting. And I have never said that and will never condone that. So just stop with the projections. big deep breaths. What's this person's name? Schlock homes. Eight. Oh, [00:12:00] eight, one big deep breath. My friend actually don't know if you're a guy or a girl. I have no idea. I'm not racist. But if you need me to be in your view of the world, that's okay.
That's on you. That's not on me. They've also said, yeah, I just got, this is a different comment. Same person. Yeah. I just got censored for the complete opposite opinion of all. If the racist folks here, so.dot, dot. Maybe I'm not controlling the media, even with my evil Gaga, Mo Jewish genetics. Okay.
So they've made it clear. They are a Jew, which no issues there. He never said anything bad about being Jewish. They're Jewish. They have obviously, uh, not liked the fact that I have said that we should critique whoever the crap we want to. I don't care what group they're a part of. I don't care. What race they are, what. Color.
They are what sex they are, what football team they follow, what gang or [00:13:00] cartel. They're a part of. I don't care what political affiliations they have. I don't give a bloody fucking damn to be honest, I would critique however, the crap I want to. And I've made that very clear. And I think we all should too, because I've said that.
And I've said just because they happen to be Jewish. That was a side note that I never even touched on, but I've been told you cannot critique them because they are Jewish. And I'm saying, no, I'm going to push back on that and say, no. Fuck off with that re rhetoric. I will critique whoever the crap I want.
So this individual has taken offense to that, even though it had nothing to do with being Jewish. They are Jewish and now they're pissed off. So again, Sherlock Holmes, 8 0 8 1, take a big deep breath. Stop projecting based on what you think. I'm saying that I'm not stop filling in the blanks based on your work, your own worldview and your own self perception, big deep breaths.
Go and pour yourself a cup of tea and actually listen to what I'm saying. And if you actually listen to what I'm saying, In order to [00:14:00] understand rather than, to prove wrong. Then you actually hear that. I don't say anything of what the crap you think I'm saying. There you go.
And then on the video, the war and masculinity, why strong men are feared someone by the name of ZX? Zac 7, 3, 6, 8 has said, damn what a sick riff. Thank you. I do love my intro as well. I have a pretty cool song on the intro of all of my, um, YouTube videos. So thank you.
Then we're going to talk about briefly the cult spotlight videos that I did.
So this was on the Potter's house Christian fellowship. So it was a full episode. And you can see the video up on YouTube. I've had a few recent comments on this video, actually. So we'll go through some of those.
So Mandy speaks up. Thank you for speaking up. I also speak up about this traumatic environment.
I also escaped in 2018 after almost 20 years. So grateful others are also speaking up. Thank you. Yeah. So I was a part of, if you haven't listened to that video, I was a part of the Potter's house Christian [00:15:00] fellowship from pretty much birth. And I didn't leave until around my mid twenties. I was raised in the Launceston Tasmania church in Australia. I left there at the age of 20, because my family and I moved from Tasmania to Perth, Western Australia, because we still wanted to be a part of the fellowship as they called it.
But we just needed to get away from the actual church that we were in, in Tasmania, in Launceston. As we kind of realized how nuts the church was that I was raised in, but we thought it was just that church, not the rest of the fellowship. So we moved. To the Beechboro church in Perth, Western Australia, to be a part of that one, I then married within the church, but I married a guy from the Sydney Potter's house church.
So we got married in Perth. And two days later I moved to Sydney. So one of the Sydney Potter's house churches to be a part of that one. Um, obviously as I was married, the woman follows the man to his church. And then we moved from Sydney back to Perth, probably three, four years later. And I left that [00:16:00] church left Potter's house for good at around the age of 25.
So major chunk of my life, I was actually a part of the Potter's house, Christian fellowship. So I know it well. And I've been, as I said, in 1, 2, 3 of the Potter's house churches plus traveled to many others. Um, in my time there, so. I know it well. Someone else has said, I'm happy to say I am. Number four of the four people you described that leave the church.
If you don't know what I'm referring to. I strongly encourage you to listen to the Cult spotlight episode on the Potter's house Christian fellowship, because I described that. There are basically four types. And this is my own opinion for types of individuals that will leave a Potter's house Christian fellowship, or will leave any type of cult or religious setting.
And I've kind of come up with four different categories that are common, that people kind of tend to slot into one of those four. So I'm happy to this person said, I'm happy to say I'm number four of the four people you described. Leave the church that healing took years. Yeah, I agree. [00:17:00] It does take years, but I'm happy to say I am an atheist.
I have taken control of my existence and taking responsibility over it. Not bitter, not angry. Hell. My daughter wants to get baptized at a local church and I will be there to see that. Oh, that's amazing. My wife goes to a local church. I will show up to make her happy, but when I go there, I feel nothing.
There is no save me, God feeling just a sense of I am here, just here. Cool beans. What's for lunch. As my wife is happy of my presence. Look, that's amazing. I really do believe that. No one should tell us, I really mean this. No one should tell us what our own walk is in life. That is for us to discover for ourselves, whether that means somebody is an atheist or someone believes in God is completely up to them. I personally am not an atheist.
I've never been an atheist. But I don't think that just because I believe in the existence of a creator, that that means everyone else has to think that like a genuinely, I think everyone gets to come up with their [00:18:00] own understanding of life and of what's out there because at the end of the day, we're all guessing.
We are all guessing. I understand that some of us are like, look, I feel things strongly. It has to be real. I understand that. But we still are only guessing. We don't really know what the crap is going on in this world. Truly. We all have theories. We all have experiences. We all have ideas. And, but at the end of the day, like it's up to the individual.
So thank you so much for your comment. Thank you for being here and thank you for contributing to the conversation that was. Hey, it's that guy? Four or 5, 1 7. And then someone else has said. As an ex member of this cult, I found people leaving this Cult was so common that members never blink an eye to it.
People are coming and going all the time. Potter's house does have a serious problem in keeping people in the cult. On shunning, et cetera, never happened as from my experiences. There are never any rules in banning members having contact with X members and many [00:19:00] did. Nor am I saying, this is not true.
It depends on the church location and pastor. And I would agree on that point. It definitely depended on the church, the location and the pastor, because in the ones that I was a part of, if someone left, yeah, you definitely had to try to get them back. And if they didn't come back, you had to shun them.
Like you don't have contact with them. This person continued to say much also depends on the pastors. Some pastors won't enforce Potter's house or ideology while others do, by the way, my pastor was Greg Mitchell. Just for context, for anyone listening. Greg Mitchell was the, so the leader of the entire Potter's house fellowship, the person that created and founded the fellowship, his name was Wayman Mitchell.
He has since passed away. He died of old age. I think, I don't think he died of anything in particular, other than old age. I could be wrong on that, but his son was Greg Mitchell. And his son. Founded the Launceston church that I was apart of in Tasmania. Uh, so you said by the way that my pastor was Greg Mitchell, yes.
The son of the founder, despite who he was, I never [00:20:00] experienced any problems with him and he never enforced shunning at all. And I would agree. He was only our pastor in Launceston Tasmania for a matter of years. And then it was taken over by another guy where he was much more of a tyrant in the way that he ran it, him and his wife. Uh, this person says his replacement.
Cameron was a hardliner who ended up causing nearly 50% of the church to switch churches due to his iron. Hold on the ideology. And yes, I would say church splits were common in the Potter's house. Christian fellowship. Someone else has said. Uh, this is TJ Ferdinand and 6, 8, 5 0. Has. I said. The four different camps slash categories.
People fall into. Almost always comes with their own strengths, weaknesses, pros, cons, and potential threats. This is a great point. This person has raised, this is where I wanted to read this out loud. So they've based this off the four individuals that I have kind of put into categories for different [00:21:00] categories.
They wanted to point out the pros and cons of each of those categories. So I'm going to read this out person one, the one who finds healing, the first one will almost instantly find a new church, but will evaluate their beliefs. They will question the dogmatic teachings in the Potter's house, like tithing fee-based, indoctrination hardship, et cetera. This individual, most likely will most likely find a healthy church and ditch the dogmatic teachings.
Right? So that's what I said about number one. So they will leave the Potter's house, Christian fellowship. They will instantly find another church, but they will begin to heal, evaluate their beliefs, ditch a lot of the dogma. So like the teachings on hell the rapture, but they will still believe in a God and still go to a church and have like a new home in a church. And this is what they're saying is the pros and cons of these pros.
They will focus on finding a church that centers on unity and love instead of fear, manipulation and control that will most likely restore relationships that were broken while being members in Potter's house church. These individuals focus on any healing and they will [00:22:00] likely go to therapy. Actually, those are points that I made.
These are the cons. Some individuals run the risk of finding a church that is overly accepting, watered down, lukewarm, overly liberal and tolerant of sin. This is their perspective, by the way. I personally, don't see an issue with that. Like I know this will probably sound funny if you are quite staunch in your beliefs. Tolerant of sin.
It depends on how you look at that word because I, since leaving see sin as very different to how I saw it growing up. To me, sin is an absence of its any act or like action or thought that is in ego, it's ego based as opposed to living from heart-based. Love. Right. So, you know, there's so many ways that that could be expressed, whereas in the church, sin was always like the big thing.
So like, you know, sex outside of marriage, or if you're going to beat someone up or you're going to Rob someone like all the big things. Whereas to me being an egotistical pride field, religious person that thinks you have to save the world, [00:23:00] God technically is sin. Do you know what I mean? Like it's just perspective. Then they've got person 2.
So this was the person that I said they leave the cult, but the cult hasn't left them. So this person falls into, um, will fall into a church that is still very much like a Potter's house church. So very dogmatic beliefs, you know, still into. You know, fee-based indoctrination. So they're saying the pros, they may join a church that that's less crazy.
And isn't a cult. These are the cons that they see. They still actively want to save the world. They haven't evaluated their belief systems because they still hold fee-based indoctrination beliefs. These individuals will often church hop. That's what I said. They still hold the belief that they shouldn't trust themselves.
They still blindly follow. These are the type of people who refuse to do any, any healings. This is what I've said. So they've left the cult, the cult hasn't left them. They are still in the same place. These people will not pick the church. They might join a new cult or go back to the Potter's house fellowship.
Right? So these are pros and cons persons three. They go back into the [00:24:00] world. This was a person that I said, we'll leave. They won't. You know, Uh, do any healing work, uh, and these tend to be the type that do end up quite bitter and struggle to actually move on. It's like the experience is still very much alive in their system. So they've put, they leave in a bitter.
They will never move on. They don't do any inner healing work. These individuals are traumatized. They'd likely have PTSD. They take zero responsibility for their involvement. They aren't responsible for what they went through, but they are responsible for their inner healing. They run from accountability.
They think they are a victim of life circumstances. They're angry at God and the world, and everyone is to blame, but themselves. So, this is what they've sort of the pros and cons pros. They can move on if they take responsibility for their healing journey. And by the way, that was me. Right. I know this from experience cons. They don't take any responsibility, accountability.
These individuals live in fear. These people often have left the church and Jesus altogether. They are often backslidden, [00:25:00] that's his words, not mine, by the way. I don't use that term. Um, but yeah, that would be the cons person four this is the camp that I said I was in. So they leave and they go through stages of inner healing.
They see themselves as authors of their existence over time. These people rebuild their self trust and identity. They see the lessons within the pain and they become more grounded in life. Pros, these people regain their identity. These people become less reactive Potter's house, dogmatic teachings, no longer have a hold on these individuals.
They are self-assured in their beliefs and they find resolve. Now, this is what he's saying are the cons right? These people run the risk of becoming spiritual, believing in a cult ideologies. Some may leave Christianity altogether realizing they don't want to be a Christian. Some of these individuals have such a negative view of Christianity because the fellowship misinterpreted, the faith.
Many of these individuals become atheist now. I would say this person's raised some really good [00:26:00] points and I will speak to that. Particularly the last camp, because that's the camp that I would say I fall into. Yes. Some absolutely could become atheist, but I think that's, that's up to the individual to make a choice for themselves.
I don't think that if there is a God out there that that God needs us to be preaching about it. Like I just. That's just not how I view the world. I don't think that if there is a creator, like what I believe that that created them relies on us flawed human beings. to. Preach to the world about this creator.
I just don't. I just, I just don't. I don't believe that I don't believe that the God of the universe needs us. To go and teach everyone about who this God is. I think that is all done within. So if someone decides to be an atheist, I see no issue with that. Let people live their lives. I don't see that as a con. I don't.
I think everyone gets a right to decide what they want for their lives, but as [00:27:00] far as, uh, becoming overly spiritual, I do agree with that. I would say that there is a trap. In spiritual communities. I actually did a post on this recently on my Instagram, where people are acting as spiritual beings rather than just being spiritual.
And what I mean by that is. I'm seeing an overemphasis on overly spiritual language soft. I believe fake spiritual voices. It makes me want to vomit it's so not me. You know, overly spiritual clothing where we all look like we're part of a cult. And, you know, non-stop talking about who's my twin flame. All of that makes me want to vomit.
I'm not gonna lie. I think that when you go into. So I consider myself so woo. I am very spiritual. As in like, I am open to so many spiritual [00:28:00] concepts and ideas and practices. I love meditating. I love. I love. So many things that are spiritual. I don't need to list everything here, but I'm open to esoteric. Concepts and I love researching. I love learning anything that draws me closer within myself, but also closer to what I consider to be the creator. God right. Love it. But I think there is so many gross things about spiritual communities or new age practices. Not all of it.
I refuse to poo hoo on all of it. But as a self-proclaimed, woo woo female. I think that there are some pretty gross, disgusting, fake things in the spiritual community that turned me off and make me want to vomit because it's done in a way of like manipulation. It's like, I am so woo woo and so spiritual.
I have the answers for everyone. You need me? Notice the savior energy. You need me to help you. You need me to fix your life. You need to come to [00:29:00] me. To learn about how to be a better human and it's this energy of, I am better than you. And you need me. I am this savior and you need me notice the correlation between when you're highly religious and you think you have to save the world and you have that savior energy of I'm here to save the day, God hand picked me to save all you motherfuckers.
You need me. It's the same energy in the spiritual community of I've been hand-selected to help you all awaken from 3-d into five D reality. You need me to atone yourself and to rise. Out. I'm making myself sick, talking like this. To rise out of the human experience and to be. This enlightened being it's gross.
Like it's so fucking gross. Like let's just be real humans and realize that, you know what? Sometimes life is so heavy and so [00:30:00] painful. And so raw, like I've experienced the depths of emotions of the highs and the lows this year. This has been, I'm not kidding. You. One of the toughest years of my life.
I have not explained a lot on the podcast. I will at some point. This has been one of the most challenging years of my life, where I have been forced to my knees in absolute anguish and pain and tears and just grief. Over some pretty heavy stuff that's going on in my life. And in that. I crave authenticity in human beings.
I crave realness. I crave human beings that don't play, pretend that don't think that they are here to save the world that aren't so self-righteous and stuck up, that they think they have the answers for everybody. If I'm around someone like that, now it repels me in an instance. So. Wow, I'm going on a tangent here, but I would agree with you.
I think there is a risk of becoming overly spiritual. [00:31:00] In. So many different ways and. I'm going to put it aside. Let's pretend we're not talking about the Potter's house Christian fellowship for a second. And just say in general, I am repelled so strongly by individuals that are acting spiritual, but have no substance, but individuals that act like they are here to save the world, but they can't even save their goddamn selves. Like their life is a fucking shit show in a shambles behind closed doors, or they can't even maintain relationships. Or they act like they're kumbaya, everything's so sweet in life, but they get triggered and have to unfriend everybody.
The moment that they say something that they don't like, or they have to go and block everybody on social media, because they have a different political view than them, or because someone said something against mainstream or. You know, someone. Chose a different path to them in life that they don't agree with.
Now, all of a sudden we've gone from oh, kumbaya. I too [00:32:00] I'm as self-righteous cunt and I think that now I have to save the world and you're beneath me and I'm up here, like.
Goddamn. Did I just say that word?
I just think that I'm craving real humans at this point in life, more than ever. And I agree that when we are overly faked spiritual, it is disgusting. It is gross. And. I don't want it anymore. Any hoo? Wow. I went off on a tangent didn't I.
And now let's finish on this one. So then I had a short clip about the insanity of making boys apologise for being male. And someone has said I'm all the way across the world, but I thought AUS slash NZ was macho culture. I was shocked when I found out Bettina Bettina Arndt, who I've mentioned before. it was the most, maybe second to Canada, feminist country in the world.
And yeah Australia is fast becoming known, and I'm not proud of this [00:33:00] as a very feminist country, Canada and Australia. And I've mentioned these two countries numerous times as these are the playing grounds, the testing grounds for a lot of the new world order agenda for a lot of like, for instance, COVID like a lot of things were tested in those two countries first. To see how far the government could go with extremes on like mandates and protocols and, you know, Laws that they would enforce. Honestly, Canada and Australia, were up there as the highest for how much we tolerated, it's actually embarrassing as an Australian woman and someone who has also lived in Canada.
I've lived in Canada. I love Canadians. I love Canada. Always hold that place in my heart. I lived there for just under two years. I bloody love Canada. But Canada and Australia. are, the testing grounds for a lot of this shit. And yeah, it's no surprise that we are becoming known as feminist countries because I've made it clear.
The way to get control of a population [00:34:00] is to break down masculinity in men. And to turn women into masculine women. And a lot of this is pushed through feminism. I don't agree with feminism. I really, really don't. I know that gives me a lot of backlash and a lot of hate online, but I'll stand strongly in that I don't agree with what feminism has turned into.
I think it is gross. I think it is killing the family unit. I think it is. Forcing men to silence themselves and to turn into passive. Crybabies seriously. And I'm not here against men. I'm standing with you, men. I think that your masculinity is under attack. It is teaching you that you are wrong for being a male.
It is teaching you that. You are toxic, no matter what you do or say that everything that you do is toxic. Everything that you say is toxic. It's gross. It's teaching women that we have to do it all. That we should be doing it all, but we're going to go and burn ourselves out. Thinking that we have to compete with men when biologically we are [00:35:00] completely different, completely different.
And we are taught that it's wrong to be a mother or it's wrong to want to aspire, to be a mother or to aspire to be a stay-at-home mom or a wife. And, you know, all of that has been absolutely shat on by the system and by the feminist movement. It's also breaking down traditional family structure and unit. It's also teaching men that they can become women and women can become men.
Like just change your gender whenever you want. It's just, honestly, the whole thing is a shit show, but anyhow, I really appreciate your comment there that yeah. Australia and Canada are fast becoming known as feminist countries. And that's not that that is not something I'm proud of. I know there will be people out there that would be proud of that.
It's not like that's, that is a blight on our countries, in my opinion. And. There's no mistaking that those two countries are the ones that don't stand up enough against government control. And it's all linked up. Anyhow, I'll leave you with that. I [00:36:00] love your guts as always. Thank you so much for your comments. Thank you always for commenting and joining in the conversations.
I love, love, love, love commenting with you guys. Have an epic week legends. Bye.
THE SHOW
