Ep. 36 | Authorised to Kill: Exposing COVID Vaccine Deaths, Hospital Protocols, & Big Pharma with Polly Tommey & Dr. Brian Hooker


EPISODE TRANSCRIPT


Speaker: Hollie Wild

Speaker 2: Polly Tommey

Speaker 3: Dr. Brian Hooker

Speaker: So we're here today with the incredible Polly Tommy and Dr. Brian Hooker, who both are with the Children's Health Defense in America. And I'm honestly honored to have both of you here chatting with me today. This is the film's first interview in Australia I've been told. So it's a great honor. This is a topic that really fires me up and is near and dear to my heart, and I know everyone listening, it's the same.

We're gonna be discussing the film, which is Vaxxed three authorized to kill and this film is actually dedicated to all who were killed or injured by approved EUA vaccines and COVID hospital protocols. We're going to go through that in a minute. The COVID hospital protocol side of it, I think is especially going to blow everybody's mind.

The film we're about to discuss represents the remarkably consistent stories of the over 1300 individuals. With whom the children's health defense team [00:01:00] met while traveling to 30 states over the course of nine months. That's just incredible. As well as the medical scientific and legal professionals interviewed for the film, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies have largely maintained that those claims are untrue

and continue to assert that their protocols and vaccines are the safest methods for treating COVID, which is insane to me. This film showcases the stories people voluntarily shared with the team from Children's Health Defence, and they're unfiltered. This is the people study. And one of the lines that I read in the documentary is we leave it to you to decide where the truth lies.

And that gives me chills. So I actually want to start, I would love for both of you to just briefly introduce yourselves and what motivated you to get involved with, I guess the children's health defense, but this film project in and yeah, maybe we'll start with you , Polly. [00:02:00]

Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, sure. Really my whole motivation is because of my son, Billy.

My son, Billy, is my second child and he was injured, after having just one routine vaccination. I was very pro vaccine. I was To the point where I didn't understand people who didn't vaccinate completely brainwashed it sounds crazy to say this now, but my son had a big seizure following just that one MMR vaccination and is 28 years old now he was 13 months when he had it.

And he will never live independently his brain injured from that shot. He lives a life that is the best that we can give him, but it's, it spurs me on every single day. to fight that this never happens to any other child because it's not, people say that autism is a gift. My son is vaccine injured and labeled autism, but it is not a gift in any way, shape, or form.

It is a horror sent right down from the pits of hell. And I think [00:03:00] many parents listening who are dealing with autism will feel the same way as me that this is not the life that our children should have had. This is a man made hell. So that's what spurs me on. And when children's health defense asked me to build CHD TV, which is our online television company, if you like It was my honor to work with fantastic individuals to be on the front lines fighting to stop the childhood schedule, to stop the shots and to stop the lies and to bring informed consent to the people around the world.

So it is a huge passion of mine and I know of Brian's too, Dr Hooker's too.

Speaker: Wow. I'm already getting chills from you speaking there. I'm, I'm very vocal about this topic. I don't agree with the childhood vaccine schedule here in Australia. I'm sure it's very similar to in America and across many countries in the world and have, have known of many stories of children being vaccine injured.

So I'm, I'm with you on that and I'm so sorry for your story. [00:04:00] spurs you literally every single day in the work that you do. That's incredible. Thank you for sharing that. And yeah, Dr. Brian Hooker, I'd love to hear from you as well.

Speaker 3: Uh, thank you so much. It's great to be on the show, Holly. And my story is very, very similar.

I received my PhD in biochemical engineering in 1990 and, you know, was looking forward to this idyllic life got married in 1991. And then. Um, you know, had a research job and was very, very pro vaccine. And when my son was born then in 1998 he was vaccinated on schedule. I didn't see any reason not to, I, and honestly, I didn't even know that vaccine injury was really a thing.

I, you know, I, I guess I, you know, I gave mental assent because there was papers that we signed. They were always seemed like they were very benign or one in a million, one in a million and never my, you know, particular child. But my son was injured by his 15 month shot. He received three vaccines in [00:05:00] one visit and was never the same.

My son cannot speak. He does not have any type of language whatsoever. He's now 26 years old. He can spell to communicate but his lifelong desire has been to be able to vocalize, and he has a lot of muscular issues, and my son Steve, like, Billy Tommy will need full-time support for the rest of his life.

He just will require that he cannot live independently. And so I started to investigate this very, very early on after my son's vaccine injury. And I started to look at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And I saw just sort of myriad malfeasance, uh, out and out fraud dismissing of concerns and it, and it just felt like.

Something was really, really wrong with the agency in the United States that was chosen to protect us and to take care of the children who were getting [00:06:00] vaccines and who were having these vaccine injuries. But there was no, there's absolutely no safety net. I mean, you know, there is what's called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which my family was in for 16 years and then dismissed.

It's an absolute complete joke, and it is a nightmare trying to wind through all the government agencies to get really, really straight answers on vaccine injury.

Speaker: Wow. So this is really personal for the both of you. What spurs you on, you can hear that deeply. Thank you so much for sharing that with us.

Um, I can imagine that, yeah, seeing your child and as they're adults now, every day would be a massive driving force behind the work that you do. So, yeah, I'm really grateful to the both of you for sharing that. As we get into This film that you guys have been a massive part of, I was really intrigued by the fact that there was so much broad experience and knowledge in the different qualifications that people held, whether these were people that you spoke to or people that you work [00:07:00] with that were involved in the making of the film.

And some of those things that I even jotted down because it just kept coming up was, people that have a PhD in chemistry. People that have worked in pharmaceuticals, the biotech industry, people that have worked in cancer research, you had a medical coder, registered nurses, doctors, like, as well as everyday people with regular jobs.

But there was so much, just diverse amount of qualifications and skills and knowledge and, um, Yeah, it blew my mind. Like this isn't because often when you hear people that will stand up and speak up against, the corruption that you see in, for instance, Big Pharma and what what is actually going on, you get labeled as a quack and you're almost seen as like, oh, it's just someone that doesn't understand science.

It's someone that doesn't understand, um, What's really going on. And that's not actually the case. And you can see that very heavily in this film that no, this is people that have, you know, PhDs that are speaking up and backing what you guys are saying. And I just would love to start, if we can go back to 2020, as much as none [00:08:00] of us want to go back there and just talk about COVID, because obviously that's what this film is focused on.

There was obviously a lot of pressure back then to be. COVID vaxxed. There was, constant media persuasion. There was mind control. There was, constant persecutions from celebrities, from government officials, from the media, anyone that didn't want to be vaccinated, like myself, we were considered, the enemy, cowards, snowflakes, losers, selfish, you're going to lose your job, all of those things.

This was, you know, worldwide, this, whether Australia, America, any country that you're listening in right now, we were all told that, the vaccinated don't get affected by COVID and you won't spread the virus, which turned out to be lies. We were told that it's completely safe and effective, which lies.

And we're also told that this is how we build up, herd immunity, because when you're vaccinated, you can't get it or spread it, which again was all lies. And, So obviously most people went out to get the vaccine, which you can understand why with all of that pressure, and it was [00:09:00] in good faith. And, we were told by medical professionals, obviously that it's safe.

And then people started having terrible reactions and people started to die. And I'd love for you to, to discuss, you know, especially related to the film, the perceived role of, mainstream media or, any of the stories that you were told where people went and got the vaccine in good faith and in good trust.

Speaker 2: And, there was a narrative around if you don't get it, how bad of a person you are. Was there any particular stories that stood out to either of you or anything you want to touch on in relation to that? Go ahead, Polly. Well, I mean, I think most of your viewers listening are going to agree with this.

Every single one of us. I mean, tell me that there's someone out there that hasn't felt the divide in their own family. Yeah, I mean, it was unbelievable. I mean, my mom took the AstraZeneca and I was like, Mom, what, what, what do you think I do? What do you think happened to your grandson? And she, she was so [00:10:00] brainwashed by the BBC in England.

So, she'd forgotten everything that had happened. And she was one of many that just were just sitting down. I blame the media. So much for so much of this because mm-Hmm, ev these particularly the elderly, would sit in front of their televisions absolutely petrified of this virus that was going around killing people.

And if you didn't take the shot, you were gonna die. Now, I don't blame these people because I was them once. Yeah. So this is where I was. Thank my son for his injury, for waking my family up so that none of our immediate family took it because of Billy. So thank you, Billy, for that. But so many, and people in our movement, Brian, did they not?

People who have been in our movement for years still fell for it. It was shocking. And Brian, you talk about this in the film,

Speaker 3: right? There were there, there was such a cognitive dissonance. of, uh, the individuals that ended up taking the [00:11:00] vaccine. And I, you know, I had, I had colleagues of mine in the health freedom movement for years and years and years that ended up, you know, because more of the sake of the difficulties that were being foisted by society impediment.

Some of them lived in cities where, you know, they had vaccine cards that they had to show to get into restaurants and things like that. And, and, you know, out of sheer convenience, other individuals, just, you know, looking at me and saying, this is the only way I can travel overseas and which really was a fallacy.

But, you know, so many individuals that ended up taking the vaccine. And absolutely regretted it. Absolutely completely regretted it because of the side effects of the vaccine. Even members of my own family that had, you know, long term life changing side effects because they ended up getting one of the COVID vaccine variants.

Speaker: I, uh, I, it was a massive propaganda machine and very well orchestrated, very well [00:12:00] orchestrated. And it's, it's devastating how much of an impact it had. And like you said, Polly, like, especially elderly who would watch, you know, TV of a nighttime, like a lot of young people don't watch the news these days, but it is more common in the elderly and just the impact and the constant fear that that would have on individual to, often make you go against maybe what your body is telling you.

I've had friends that are still living with impacts of being vaccine injured from the COVID vaccines. I, I had an ex Western Australia police officer interviewed on my podcast who still is living with stroke issues. She was completely fit and healthy. She's in her thirties prior to having the vaccine and on the first dose, she suffered seizures and ended up having a stroke and just, yeah, terrible, terrible things that were happening.

The media definitely played a huge impact in this. And I actually want to ask you what specific conflicts of interest do you see within the pharmaceutical industry and the government that may have influenced the the COVID response and, [00:13:00] the vaccine development or, any stories, big questions.

Speaker 3: There, there's so many conflicts of interest in those individuals who are pulling the strings both worldwide and, you know, from our experience in the United States, if you look at the Moderna vaccine that was approved under emergency use authorization, and then for certain portions of the population, then ultimately got full FDA approval.

The only reason that that vaccine really was advanced forward was because it was. Developed with money and with personnel directly from Dr. Tony Fauci's Institute, the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases. And it turns out that they received, you know, millions, over 350 million dollars to that agency alone.

This is a government agency that's making royalties off of the backs of individuals that got this very, very poorly thought out. Shot, you know, that's really a gene [00:14:00] therapy masquerading as a vaccine and you saw that. And then, you know, in the United States, it was very, very common for patients who are hospitalized with covert very early on to give them a drug called remdesivir.

Remdesivir is a failed drug from the Ebola clinical trial that was done prior to the COVID 19 pandemic. And in the Ebola clinical trial, literally 53 percent of the trial participants died on Remdesivir. Okay. And that was the worst worst performing drug in that Ebola trial. Well, since it was on patent, and since there was money to be made, rather than using things that are already shown to be effective, like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or zinc or vitamin D or quercetin, then again, Dr.

Anthony Fauci with Dr. Francis Collins at the NIH, Deborah Birx at the White House, all got behind Bram Desivier, and it was a killer. It was a absolute killer. It was a, you know, the [00:15:00] emergency room nurses and the intensive care nurses referred to it as run death is near because it was such a killer drug.

It would cause you your organs to feel would cause your kidneys to shut down. It would cause fluid to pull up in the lungs because of the kidney failure. They would put patients on ventilators that were completely ineffective mechanical ventilation. And then ultimately they would die. I mean, you know, it was, it was a setup from the very, very beginning.

Speaker: Yeah. Those patients could have and should have survived, but instead they were sacrificed at sort of the bequest of Big Pharma for Gilead Science's drug of choice, Remdesivir. Yeah, that's a big thing that really shocked me in the film. I knew in the core of my gut that things were being faked as far as, you know, any death in a hospital was deemed as a COVID death, even if someone had just come in like from a car accident, for instance, but then it'd be labeled as a COVID death.

You just knew in the core of your [00:16:00] body you would hear things and you're like, something's not right about this. It's just But the whole remdesivir that was discussed in this film really shocked me to my core. And I did a little bit of research on it, even in Australia. It was approved very early on in 2020 to be used in Australia.

The same protocols that you mentioned in the film within America. It was, it appears to be the same as what was going on in Australia as well. And. I noted that in the film, it said that Dr. Fauci stated that remdesivir diminishes the time of recovery for COVID, which wasn't even true because the trial showed that it had no benefit on COVID 19 unless the trials had a conflict of interest to Gilead.

You know, if they, were working with or were linked with Gilead Sciences and yeah, of course they would, they would say, yeah, it's going to help. But those that weren't linked with Gilead said, no, it actually does not help with COVID 19. But yeah, Anthony Fauci pushed these hospital protocols, which In my mind that that to me says that he has blood on his hands personally, like I will [00:17:00] say that very strongly because yeah, he there's money to be made over people's lives.

Speaker 3: In the pandemic, I'm sorry for jumping in, but you know, he was his his net worth prior to the pandemic was 5 million. And he was the highest paid government employee even above the president of the United States. Before the pandemic, he made 450, 000 a year. That was his paycheck. And then after the pandemic, his net worth jumped from from 5 million to 14 million.

And so he more than doubled his net worth over the period of pandemic. And there was such a wealth redistribution at that point in time, the rich were getting richer, the poor were getting poorer. At the right point in time, people were dumping their Moderna stocks, selling their Moderna stock with insider trading information.

And it was just a blessed nightmare.

Speaker: And also in the film that you stated that you know, prior to the use of remdesivir as the hospital protocol that [00:18:00] was enforced, whether patients gave consent or not, it was enforced that, things like Is it hydro? You mentioned it before hydrochloric.

I can't pronounce it properly. That's the one that that was working well in hospitals. And then obviously the bonus for using remdesivir came out and it seemed like there was a line drawn in the sand that it was in the hospital's best interest financially to use remdesivir, but it obviously wasn't in the best interest of the actual patients because it was literally killing them and, and, giving them kidney failure, for instance, and.

That's alarming. That's highly alarming to me. The whole

Speaker 2: thing is a lot. I mean, everything that we uncovered on the bus shook us to the core. I mean, we went out there expecting to get COVID injury shots and potentially death. But what we got was lines and lines of people with the same story over and over again.

And for me the worst part, yeah the remdesivir is bad, the worst [00:19:00] part about the whole hospital protocol was the absolute awful barbaric way in which these people died. So they were separated from their loved ones, they were COVID tested over and over again until they were positive, they might not even gone in with COVID issues, UTI, whatever it is.

Oh no, they had to get a COVID positive test, then they were taken and then they were given remdesivir. Then they were in four point restraints, their phones were taken away from them, they were not given any fluids, they were not given any food, they were put on paralytic drugs because they were trying to get out, and they were vented, and they were fentanyled, and they were killed.

 these stories, there's no words to describe how these people died. It's beyond belief to understand that a human being can treat another human being like that. I don't care who you are, how can you sit by and watch that happen? And they did. The good doctors, the good nurses, they left, but the other ones, they have blood on their hands.

I'm sorry, but [00:20:00] they do. They knew what they were doing, and they killed countless. And I think this is the tiny beginning in the film of countless people that were murdered in those hospitals. And in Australia, and England, we're hearing about the Mendazim murders. It was the same protocol with maybe different drugs, but the aim was authorised to kill.

And that's why the film's called Authorised to Kill.

Speaker: Yeah, and it is murder. And do you genuinely think it comes down to money? Is that what it is? Is that what all this is for? Well, I

Speaker 3: think money is part of it. I think there's a much bigger agenda in play. You know, when you look at, you know, the World Economic Forum and, and the other sort of the oligarchs that are that sit in power don't want to.

Most of us here. I mean, when you talk to them, they say that the optimum world population is less than a billion people, you know, and right now we're at about 8. 5 billion people. So that [00:21:00] means that nine out of 10 of us have to go away somehow. And, you know, to me, it just seems dastardly that you would take these, these very, very horrifying drugs and and replace the therapeutics that were effective with Or this particular virus, and then you would take an untested gene therapy, call it a vaccine.

And then you would foist that also on society. You know, there were other vaccines. I'm not saying that other vaccines are good, but there were other vaccine technologies that could have been used that would have been more appropriate for this, but they used this particular crisis, this particular disaster, that could have To roll out these M.

R. N. A. modified messenger R. N. A. shots, these D. N. A. vector shots like the AstraZeneca, and these were new, naive, untested technologies. And really, when you look at the core of them, they were gene therapy, they were gene altering therapeutics. And now we're seeing such an increase in the rate of, of what are being [00:22:00] called turbo cancers.

These cancers that are popping up that some people before they were vaccinated, they were in remission, then all of a sudden they will come out of remission. Their cancers will become active again. Others that are being diagnosed with cancer and then dying within months of cancers that are supposed to take years to grow.

It's absolutely incredible. And so I think that Holly, money is a driver. That was a part of a driver, but I think that there's more of an insidious agenda that's going on, you know, even worldwide now that, you know, they're queuing up with the next pandemic might be like, is it going to be monkey pox?

Is it going to be avian influenza? Is it going to be Marburg virus? You know, some type of enter a virus that is going to, you know, wipe out population. But we keep on hearing these things about, you know, what the next pandemic will be. Well, it makes sense. You know, if you look at the coffers of Pfizer and Moderna, they've, they've lost all the revenue that they were making over the first pandemic.

Well, by good and by golly, [00:23:00] they want it back. They want those revenues back. And so that's why these new pandemics are being played out, queued up. And then hopefully, you know, those powers that be are waiting for something to stick to the wall, you know, but we're in the front lines, waking people up, wanting them to wake up.

So this never happens again.

Speaker: Yeah, I fully agree with everything you just said, like fully agree with you and there definitely will be more for sure. And I think this is why the film that you guys have created here is so incredibly important for everybody to watch because if you're not aware of what's going on, you will just line up and get the next whatever is rolled out, whatever is again, peer pressured onto you by the media, by celebrities, by family members.

And I think the more that we're aware of what is actually going on that is often rejected, silenced, criticized, ridiculed, all of the above. The more that we go under that and actually look at, okay, hang on, let's look at this in a neutral way. [00:24:00] What's actually going on. I think that's really important for everyone to look at.

And one of the things you just mentioned then actually is cancers. That also stood out to me in the film you know, it mentioned that cancers are slow to develop. Usually that blood cancers can take a few years typically to develop, whereas solid tumors can take, you know, decades to develop. I didn't actually know that prior to this film.

So thank you for that knowledge. But. That there has been such an acceleration, as you said, of tumors since having the MRNA vaccine and genetic injections and that the tumors could have already been in our body and being benign. And we wouldn't even know that they're there and they could possibly go away on their own, but that now post COVID vaccines, that they are developing more rapidly.

And I am personally hearing even through. Family and friends, friends, family members of more cancer than I remember hearing before. And it seems like that our immune systems for anyone that has taken the shot that the immune systems are [00:25:00] often destroyed from these vaccines and therefore cancers can be, growing more quickly because of the immune system.

They're not able to fight off the cancers. Is there anything you want to add more to that? Young?

Speaker 2: How many young people?

Speaker 3: Go ahead. I'm sorry, Polly. Go ahead. No, I'm

Speaker 2: just saying it's shocking how many young, young people, young, young people getting cancer. And, and they took the shot. So for me, that's, that's a bit, I mean, my age, you know, people unfortunately do get cancer.

But these young, we've never seen so many young people getting cancer. Yeah. Or dropping down a costly

Speaker 3: and so many, there were so many different mechanisms built into these injections that could cause cancers, you know, it's not just, oh, well, what if you know they keep on saying that the messenger RNA doesn't reverse transcribe and integrate into your chromosomes.

That is never been shown to be true. You know, in fact, there's [00:26:00] really strong, compelling evidence showing exactly the opposite. And then the fact that they use, you know, that DNA contaminants were, discovered in the vaccines of what's called Simeon virus, virus 40 Simeon virus 40 is a known oncogen.

It's a backbone. It's what's called a DNA plasmid that they use to produce the messenger RNA. And but they never cleared out those DNA particles. And so to me, it's very, very suspicious that this all of this, sort of toxic soup was put into our bodies. And, you know, then people are surprised that it ramifies and cancers.

Well, you know, if you look at what actually was put into the vaccines, it's very, very predictable. It's highly predictable. And that is what you would expect to see happen once you start to Holly, like you said to start to suppress the immune system, then you expect to see more of these, you know, tumors that the body would naturally eliminate pre cancerous cells that would not continue to be pre [00:27:00] cancerous, but instead they're ramifying in cancer now.

Speaker: Yeah. Wow. Honestly, it's yeah. And you're right. It is young, young people affecting as well. It's not just, older people whose immune systems may already not be as strong, but it's It's young individuals as well. And just to take you back to, I would love to touch on the hospital protocols just a little bit more.

One thing that did stand out that you did briefly mention there, Polly, was about how, you know, for instance, they're isolated, so family members couldn't even be present. Family members often weren't even allowed to phone, their loved ones that were in hospitals. And, even the reports of, people not being given water, that apparently it was part of the protocol that they weren't even allowed to be given water, like that blew my mind.

It blew my mind. Often not even fed, not even washed if they're in, in there for like days on end or not even rolled in the bed if they're like laying still for long periods of time. And another thing that stood out was people being put on ventilators. There was this big [00:28:00] push to get them on ventilators often when it wasn't actually necessary.

And again, that, hospitals would be given a larger bonus or, whatever it was that they would receive For, you know, meeting certain criteria that went against it. What the patients actually needed that often they just needed from my understanding, I'd love for you to elaborate more like oxygen, or maybe vitamin C could have helped, or maybe they needed a steroid or whatever it might've been, but not necessarily what the protocol was.

And the fact that they kept getting pushed to go on to remdesivir or to have loved ones being put onto ventilators. And they would say, no, I don't want this. No, I don't want this, but then would be put on it anyway. Like how, I don't even know where to start with this. How do we stop this from happening again?

Speaker 2: Like, where do you even begin with this? Well, how do we stop it from happening? First of all, let's go back to the, the whole procedure that you just talked about. I mean, most of these people, the remdesivir, most people weren't, didn't have any clue they were on it. They didn't get a choice, they just got put on it.

The ventilation [00:29:00] thing was a different ball game. The loved ones back at home would be, because the patient would be like, I don't want to be ventilated. They would say this over and over again. So they would call and harass the family at home. If your loved one doesn't get on this ventilator, he or she is going to die.

And so they would scare them. And most of them said no, they've said no, we don't want it. That's when the paralytic drugs would come in. And it was always overnight. Thanks. Overnight they would be vented and it would be taken from them. They just took control of this patient and you had no rights if it was someone you loved.

The minute they were in that door they were prisoners. of the hospital and you were shut out and it wasn't, you know, we saw that with the disabled people as well, the people like Billy or the people with Down syndrome, they were also taken as well. You had no rights and I think, how do we stop this happening again?

That's why we made this film. We were supposed to go for a whole year on the bus. We stopped it just coming up to nine months because we knew we needed to get back. It was the same [00:30:00] stories over and over again. We had to get back and make it into film and warn people before this winter that we're about to go into now of there's going to, you're going, I didn't know that it was dangerous to go to hospital.

Now I know. Do not go to hospital unless it's a life or death situation and if it is, someone's got to go with you that's going to advocate for you or you will not make it out, most likely.

Speaker: Yeah,

Speaker 3: especially if they're under emergency use authorization and those authorizations still stand those still stand and we still have what's called the CARES Act in the United States and because of the CARES Act, then the doctor can, end up prescribing things against the patient's wishes.

It was, you know, a, a sort of a quote unquote stopgap effort to keep the virus from spreading to other individuals. So, you know, then they would give care that was refused underneath the cares act and in order to keep the virus from quote unquote spreading. Well, that was, [00:31:00] turned into a moneymaker for hospitals.

See, the hospitals were starved of money at first because they shut everything down. Right at the very beginning of the COVID pandemic in March of 2020, so hospitals were shut down, you know, major businesses were shut down, small businesses were shut down, everything was locked down, and so all of these hospitals now starving for money, then the influx of COVID patients or influx of any type of patient, as long as they can get a positive COVID PCR test on them, they get more money, they put them on remdesivir, instead of getting 1, 700, they get 3, They put them on a ventilator, then they get another surcharge for the ventilator that they're able to tax directly from the federal government through Medicaid into a Medicare.

And then once they got them into intensive care on mechanical ventilation on paralytic drugs, Then they were making upwards to a quarter of a million dollars per patient. And so that's the revenues that were, the hospitals were [00:32:00] making and they were making this, they were putting me on untenable position.

They should have never done it in the first place, but either close the doors or kill patients. They decided to kill patients.

Speaker: Yeah. Legit kill them because patients weren't all dying of COVID. They were dying from either vaccine injuries or the hospital protocols at the end of the day, but it was all being labeled as COVID.

Speaker 3: Exactly. So many deaths progressed in the absolute same manner. They were given remdesivir. They were, and they did not need remdesivir. And it makes no sense, as it was said in the movie by the registered nurse, it makes no sense to give an antiviral after, you know, the incubation period of the virus.

Speaker: After, you know, say 24 to 48 hours, antivirals are ineffective. So the fact that they were giving this is extremely, extremely suspect in the first place. But it was a real moneymaker and it was what hospital [00:33:00] administrators were choosing to do to stay in business. This is why I recommend everyone listening to definitely go and watch this film, because one of the things that stood out is I feel like if anyone watching it, maybe they don't know someone personally who was vaccine injured or who died, you know, from a hospital protocol, they might be like, Oh, it's, you know, it wasn't that bad or it didn't affect that many.

I think you'll be surprised by the stories and the continual stories with very similar themes through all of them. That these are real people that have been affected. These are lives that have been lost. And if you put yourself in the shoes of the family members that are left grieving, like it definitely brought up emotions for me.

It, yeah, it was very confronting, but in the best way possible, it was such a well put together film. You guys did such an incredible job on it, but the message behind it is these are real people. Like these are real lives that are being affected. And, This is not the last pandemic. There are going to be more and this is going to continue.

And but one of the [00:34:00] things I always choose to believe in, and I'm sure you guys do too, because of the work that you're doing, is the people do hold the power, but we just have to realize that. And Yes, these companies seem so big. They seem like these big giants and they are as far as, you know, money and power, but there's more of us.

And I do choose to hold hope that as much as I would love to say that nobody died from a hospital protocol that was just an absolute disaster and murder at the end of the day, or no one died from a vaccine injury. Something that I do love that I can take from that is the fact that more and more people are waking up and are now so hesitant around vaccines that weren't before that were very pro vaccines and now are like, hang on, if the COVID vaccine was like this, what's the childhood vaccine schedule like?

I'm hearing more and more people like that. And I think that that is a positive that we have to be able to take from something like this. And I'm guessing, are you finding the same thing [00:35:00] that more and more people are? Just more hesitant to just blindly trust maybe the government or, you know, big pharma, for instance.

Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I mean, I can't tell you how many people sat on the bus and said we will never take another shot again. These are people that got injured either by the shot or watched their loved one die in hospital and then they went and did their research. You know, there was one woman who was in her 90s and she said, I will never, I've been vaccinating myself all my life and I'm stopping right now and I loved it because you know it doesn't matter what age you are once you wake up to it and unfortunately we are all so brainwashed with this vaccine schedule that it is taking for us to have someone we love hurt to wake us up and that's sad that's why if we can do our job through these films and if the people And you're right when you say the power of the people.

It doesn't matter how many qualifications you've got against your name. It doesn't matter whether you're a doctor because they'll just say, Oh, you know, Dr. Blah, blah, blah [00:36:00] is a, is a quack. Take his license away. Shove him away. He's a nutter. Put him a headline on the BBC or something and everyone will believe it.

But when we collectively come forward worldwide and tell our stories, It's game over for the other side because we are the power and that's why they divide us. That's why they, they call us anti vaxxers. I mean, how can you call the people on the bus anti vaxxers? They took the COVID shot. How, they are not anti vaxxers.

We are ex vaxxers. We've woken up, we're not going to do it again, and they don't get away with shouting anti vaxxers at us. Anti vaxxers are very clever people who did their research and didn't vaccinate their kids, and their kids are perfectly healthy. We have seen the health of the unvaccinated. I mean, Dr Hooker has done studies on this.

It is unbelievable. The lie that we were all told.

Speaker 3: Absolutely. And, and so many medical professionals have, through the pandemic, have reached out to Children's Health Defense for [00:37:00] more information. You know, they're not getting this information in medical school. They're getting it in medical school.

They're about a day's worth of immunology. That says that vaccines are safe and effective. And here's the schedule and you should recommend the schedule. And, you know, oh, by the way, you'll get incentives from the blue cross blue shield for vaccinating your patients. That's what people are learning in medical school.

So other, you know, medical professionals are coming out in droves and saying, no, we don't trust the system any longer. Many of them. Were displaced over the code of a pandemic because they saw the crisis, they saw the carnage that was going on and they decided to choose something absolutely different.

And as Polly said, you know, when you study the health of the unvaccinated, you know, this is the control group that the government wish would go away. But these children that are not getting vaccinated are so much more healthy. They're so much more robust. You see really life the way that God intended it with these individuals not [00:38:00] getting ear infections, not getting respiratory infections, not having comprised compromised immune systems, not getting long term chronic diseases.

Not having neurological issues, really smart, bright, bright Children that are having really the best opportunity to, you know, survive and thrive in this environment. It is just astounding. And when you study those numbers, they don't lie. They show that the unvaccinated are having these issues in much, much less proportion than those Children who are following the CDC schedule.

Speaker: Yeah, I stand with you both strongly on that. I will very boldly say no child of mine will ever be getting a vaccine, not one. I will never be taking a vaccine. The last vaccine I took was 12 years ago when I went through the police Academy. And I don't even know what it was back then. I just, I just took it.

I was like, yeah, sure. Whatever it, I had no idea what I took. And that was the last one I ever took because I started to awaken after that. And I was [00:39:00] like, Ooh, something's not right. And that was before I even had my daughter. I was like, I need to look into it. all this, before I become a parent, cause something's not sitting right with me.

And I have my older brother to thank for that because he really opened up my eyes to a lot of it. And I find that has a ripple effect because you are right. I do look at the unvaccinated children that I know, and definitely a very big difference in health, how quickly they recover from things, how alert they are.

That's a big thing that I've noticed just a real alertness within them. And. This is not something to ignore. I really stand with you both on this, that the more that parents start to look into it for themselves and not just think, Oh, I'm not a doctor. I don't have a degree. What would I know? But actually dig deep and, and really look into more and more information that you can find and really open up your mind to maybe it's not all as it's been painted.

And we do need to wake up to the chronic health that is amongst children with the current [00:40:00] vaccine schedule in whatever country you're in. It's the same across the board. So I really stand with you both before we finish, because I would just want to be so respectful of your time as it's so late in America right now.

Is there anything else? That you want to add any question that you wish I had have asked you just anything you want to add at all.

Speaker 3: first of all, let me jump in so we can finish with you. Polly. 1 of the things that stands in contrast We were just talking about the health of the unvaccinated, you know, now the CDC in the United States has Over 50 needle sticks by the time a child is 18 years of age, and over 30 of those needle sticks happen in the first year of life.

Literally, there are appointments that children will walk in that they can get as many as 8 different needle sticks. That's, you know, in some of our multi antigen vaccines, like the DTAP or the MMR, where you're getting multiple diseases in the same needle and the children that are being damaged by this are like none we've seen before, we talk about turbo cancer.

[00:41:00] I think that we need a term called turbo autism because these children are so debilitated. They, you know, they have no muscle tone. They can't lift their hands. They can't walk. They can't even lift their heads above their necks. You know, they're just so debilitated. And so, you know, I think it's really imperative that people look at the entire vaccination schedule and really look at that.

And, and, you know, Polly said it herself, it only takes one. It really only takes one vaccine. You know, people will say, Oh, well, I'll space it out. I'll, you know, I'll wait until they're a certain age. It really only takes one vaccine to take away your child.

Speaker 2: Yeah. I would like to say to your viewers is something that I wish I'd known.

I think it starts in education. I really applaud the homeschoolers of this world right now, because when you are sent to school, I was sent to boarding school at age nine, and I was kind of an unruly child. But you're [00:42:00] broken down until you obey, you'll talk to obey authority, you do not question authority.

If someone's got a white coat on you don't, that's what happens in school. And so I implore parents out there, please teach your children to be respectful, but, but to, to question everything, you have to question everything, and it is your right to say no. So when you're in a pediatrician's office, which by the way, I recommend you never go to a pediatrician, But anyway, when you're in a doctor or pediatrician situation, if you're feeling that gut feeling, something's not right, get out.

Because it's only going to get worse from there on. And I would say the same in a hospital. We are bullied and we are lifelong learners. We're always learning. So get, turn off your mainstream. News. Tune in to podcasts like this, CHD TV, all of the great people out there that are trying to break down the truth and trying to figure it out so that you get the knowledge that you need.

So educate yourself all the time. Don't think you know it [00:43:00] all. None of us do. We're learning every single day. But teach your children. That they are in charge of themselves and their future families, not the politicians, not the pediatricians, not the dentists, not the doctors, nobody but you are in charge.

Because once that needle goes in, or that poison, or whatever it is you decide to put into yourself or your child, there is no going back. You can improve the quality of life for that child or yourself that's injured, or you like. And yes, you can do that, but you will never have the same child that you had before.

Before that vaccine went in. So please learn from Brian and I and our mistakes. We're here to make sure this doesn't happen to you because it's the deepest pain that you can ever feel as a parent that we could have prevented this. So please learn from us.

Speaker: So well said the both of you and I would stand and say that I would believe someone who when they're speaking like this, they face constant ridicule, constant criticism, [00:44:00] backlash, hatred, like all of the things they don't stand to gain, like you're not gaining anything you're actually being targeted.

Whereas someone who stands to gain a crap ton of money and power, like I would honestly not trust that instantly. I, this podcast, the whole premise behind it is to question every single institution, system, authority, person in power, and It's not, like a know it all, but it's to find truth.

I'm all about finding truth, and that's the whole purpose of this platform. And yeah, I can't thank you both enough. I'm going to link the film in the show notes, as well as the Children's Health Defense website. Is there anything else that you would like to promote while you're here? No, but the film is

Speaker 2: free.

I want everyone to know that. Nobody has to pay any money for this film. Children's Health Defence have graciously given this for the world free. We're just having it translated into Spanish right now. Someone's donated that. So everything is done from the people to the people, free. So just go to chd. tv and it's in the movie section right there, [00:45:00] free.

Speaker: I'm definitely going to link it. That's incredible. That's incredible. You guys have done that. Thank you so much for your time. Honestly, the both of you. I'm so grateful to you and all the work that you're doing. It is powerful. The ripple effect that it's going to have across the world. So thank you.

Speaker 2: Thank you Holly.


THE SHOW



Previous
Previous

Ep. 37 | 🍿Comment Chaos: YouTube Censorship, Masculinity, and the Anti-Semitism Debate

Next
Next

Ep. 35 | 🍿Comment Chaos: The Masculinity Debate Heats Up